InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
-0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,181.60
(
-0.43%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
84.85
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
61,809.25
(
1.51%
)
Post# of 93820
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

friendlyfred

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 15
Posts 4909
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/08/2002

friendlyfred

Re: hollywoodhills post# 70061

Sunday, 06/19/2005 12:23:01 PM

Sunday, June 19, 2005 12:23:01 PM

Post# of 93820
How blind could we have been? Those shares traded at .33 were probably needed to sell short. Now that naked shorting is alledgedly a no no, actual shares will be required to sell short. I mentioned this to a couple of people when it was occurring but didnt want to post it here or on RB and get people worked up. We may have another indicator to work with though; periods of large accumulation followed by a price collapse?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up