InvestorsHub Logo

doughboy2

09/07/11 8:13 PM

#8240 RE: Anvil #8239

avil - nice post.

one thing - once again "transparancy" was mentioned in the PR - my hope is they follow up with an 8k sgned by jeff.

also, wish to throw out a widcard for your comment:

what if jeff wins the current lawsuit and regans control of Q?

iwondertoo

09/07/11 8:53 PM

#8245 RE: Anvil #8239

I tend to disagree. But, that's O.K. I can see your viewpoint.

I also would hesitate to believe that bandwidth is here, without hearing directly from Wade Thompson.....which is, I gather, something you are assuming, from the point number 6 that you made.

I am a dedicated I'll believe it when I see it, at this point in my life. :<)

As near as I can tell, from this agreement with mineseeker, Jeff wasn't allowed to nullify the merger, who knows what else he wasn't allowed to do, that he thought he could. Now, I am not saying that he didn't do his darndest, but it appears that there was something to prevent it, like perhaps, a share cert for 450MM shares, belonging to Centa and now, mostly belonging to mineseeker. Along with several notes and agreements.

If the merger had been nullified, it isn't centa from whom mineseeker would have gotten shares. IMO

crazy horse 0

09/08/11 10:32 AM

#8271 RE: Anvil #8239

"I did send Jeff a congrats email."

I did the same good post The way I see it Joe Canouse is poison, and Dean just as bad !


IWonder, a few comments:

1. Regarding the pr. I can see where it makes no sense to mention Jeff, CEO NHSH. The pr was about NHSH and MS doing a transaction. It so happens to involve the control block of NHSH. Hence no need for Jeff to be mentioned or comment.

2. Would it of been nice to have Jeff comment? Yes. Something as little as "we welcome MS as a majority owner and look forward to formalizing our relationship and the exciting growth opportunites", and as importantly, "While it has been a challenging couple of months, I wish James Owens and the Centacom well".

3. Having said the above, I did send Jeff a congrats email. He knows that I have little interest in MS as an investment.

4. Now, in regards to Q shareholders, I truly believe that there will be some bone thrown to them. I mean Jeff/James made seemed inclined & MS, afterall, got $1.8MM (probably their life line at the time). So I would expect something in it for Q shareholders.

5. Which brings us full circle. The wild card. Does Joe move to sue N once the MS/N marriage is official? Tortious Interference. Yeah, Joe has to deal with the old trash (deano) but will he take on a multi front litigation war and is there enough in it?

6. Funny thing is, IMO, the colo/bandwidth segment has the most legs and best promise to deliver results. Bruce alluded (read btw the lines), the funding is not an issue. I hope so, Wade has been supportive beyond what many know. This is real, now and profitable.

Well as usual, a few turned into several. Wish all success. That is except deano.

texkengold

09/08/11 12:43 PM

#8276 RE: Anvil #8239

yup, last i saw of Jeff Didheknifeus was on August the 30th

so, anvil consider this.
1) Joe? did Joe play END for his football team.... in honor of tonights kickoff of the NFL?

2) does Joe have "endgame" as announcer may say tonite?

3) isnt joe seeking a settlement for the
commonshareholders of QASP? and a credible one to boot?

4) werent commonshareholders screwed by Jeff Digenova by his own design?

5) they did incorporate centa and nhsh in a way that included 150M shares in their merger agreement to boot? dang another boot!

6) So, isnt he now seeking to make a deal with nhsh and mineseeker?

7) dont you think that should that settlement fail, then joe can easily continue his litigation, on the same path, that is growin day by day?
for your consideration Anvil.
Ken
texkengold@yahoo.com
jmho
gltya