InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

chaarles

08/31/11 4:38 PM

#332677 RE: marayatano #332668

That's correct I did think the same when I was listening.
I also believed that she asked that because the EC presented IT allegations against the 4 hedgies but only filed the Motion to prosecute the claims against Aurelius and Centerbridge. So for me, it's clear she is buying the IT allegations against the 4 hedgies so she needed to know if the EC is gonna move against the 4 or just 2.
I'm expecting a very positive JMW opinion for equity.
GLTY mara
icon url

gophilipgo

08/31/11 6:05 PM

#332701 RE: marayatano #332668

100% agree
icon url

REALtime64

08/31/11 6:35 PM

#332718 RE: marayatano #332668

See that's how you think this is a true fact and proves to me POR and GSA is dead nice post Way Better than this so called experts babble on this board as of late Hatz off to you
icon url

955

08/31/11 9:58 PM

#332774 RE: marayatano #332668

JMW's "Fair and Reasonable" comment spoke volumes to me about her underlying motives. Doing the right thing is not her primary objective. There are many other examples as well. If she's had a change of heart, she'll have to prove it to me first by her actions. Thus far, she only seems to rule in EC's favor and/or FDIC/JPM's disfavor when forced to. If it weren't for S&G, we would have been put out to pasture long ago, IMO. We will still get a piece of the pie, how big will be determined by S&G, and they do seem to carry a BIG HAMMER OF JUSTICE. AIMHO.