InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Invest1111

06/14/05 9:52 AM

#2198 RE: Torvecian #2197

Torvecian, Did you buy any snake oil?
icon url

GotTraction

06/15/05 1:25 AM

#2203 RE: Torvecian #2197

The 'Gleasman Differential'? Why didn't he call it that from 1958 to the early 80's? I thought it was called the Triple D...

It seems if there was not an exclusive waiver, that there should have been one. If you or I had invented something exclusive, wouldn't you desire to retain the exclusive rights to it? To negotiate a deal, this would be the ultimate position. Why would it be funny to not want this? Anything else would be a comprise, yes, and might ultimately, be the final result once a deal was closed.


icon url

Reporter321

06/15/05 7:57 PM

#2209 RE: Torvecian #2197

No per unit royalty?

Confirmation on this from anyone else, maybe someone a little more neutral?

I not sure why Jim thought it was so funny. His dad is the one that told me. I stand by my story.

However, the supposed absence of a per-unit royalty still does not explain why Torvec can not sell or license anything.

Regardless, I apologize for raising the question. I retract the question, and will not post again (after tonight) until at least 1 weeks time. I am sure in my absence and the absence of a per unit royalty, Torvec stock will take off!

.50 to 1.33$