Yes it was!!!!!!Wasn't it Rosen's responsibility to provide the court with an accurate list of the estate's assets? What if it is discovered and proven that he misrepresented those assets to the court?
They are to assure with an audit of all assets to assure that the value is what it is.
When Bets was before the Judge that Judge wanted more proof, But Bet had more proof than rosen does of the asset value he is presenting and should have stated that. Bets should have replied to the judge since rozen does have to show a 3.1a or a signed P/A then why do I need more proof that JPM and others traded incorrectly including the debtors!!!!!!