InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

vg_future

08/18/11 11:16 AM

#332136 RE: JimLur #332133

JimLur, I am not sure if the author really understands IDCC because he says Kodak imaging patents can be used as defense and hence would devalue the portfolio. Even in the case of Google, he thinks that MMI patents are good enough to defend against Apple and MSFT. If that is the case, why is MMI having an issue doing the same. It will definitely be more ammunition, but not certainly a complete defense. So, as per few other analysts, Google might still need IDCC's patents.

-vg_future
icon url

scruffynyc1

08/18/11 11:22 AM

#332137 RE: JimLur #332133

These hacks are clueless. I'm clueless but I still don't see how ek and idcc continuously get mentioned in the same context.

Thankfully, in a few short weeks, the uninformed will change their tune. (hopefully).
icon url

dmiller

08/18/11 11:30 AM

#332139 RE: JimLur #332133

This article was already released a day or two ago. I don't know why it has today's date on it.