Replies to post #331800 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[scruffynyc1]

My $.02 is that he was under so much pressure on Monday that he felt he had to say something.

I wonder if he would be on the hot seat if he did appear on CNBC?

[jmspaesq]

Flyboy:My thoughts are as I posted earlier. That may have been Ron Shuttleworth being less than precise with his words and context. I take the company's statement to mean that the process is ongoing without confirming any details--but that is good news IMHO in that it means that even after the Googorola deal, the process is ongoing, which is what I expected when they didn't announce that it was over.

So it is up to Ron Shuttleworth to clarify what he meant.

JMHO

Joel

[JimLur]

flyboy, He may have heard that from others in the industry. I don't think it's a big deal.

JMO

[The_Net]

re. MPartners. Thanks. That’s what I expect. I don’t think IDCC directly provided MPartners the “status update”. Notice that IDCC (LW) wants to respond to us through telephone instead of email. It’s a sensitive and delicate matter.

I have received a response from LW asked for my telephone number to discuss my questions. Haven't talked to her yet.

I have no idea where and how RS got the info.

You wrote,

"Regarding MPartners statement that "Interdigital management disclosed that the process is moving along as planned and that there are multiple bidders."

I just received a phone call from Linda Noskewicz, who works with Janet Point in the IR department. I asked her if the above comment comes directly from the company. Her answer is "no". Interdigital stands by the press release on July 19th, and nothing more has changed from the verbage in that PR.

So Ron's statement in the report is NOT from the company. Any thoughts from the gallery??"