InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

wamuvoodoo

08/15/11 1:28 PM

#328443 RE: warcton #328440

them knowing that the deal was off isn't material..come on brotha
icon url

steel58

08/15/11 2:16 PM

#328472 RE: warcton #328440

As a small trader, I would never say that any information I could get was nonmaterial. I could not get the information the SNH's had. If I had that information, ,even though I'm not a market genius, I could have simply looked at the trades and said whoa, somebody is buying mucho PIERS, I may want to jump in on that one.

If they traded with non-public information, the JMW better be real careful and not blindly rule it was not material. Common sense hopefully should cause her to rule on the side of caution and assume it was material unless all trading records indicate otherwise. Since I'm sure that every trade during the questionable periods cannot be accounted for, again she better play it safe and send a message that any even slight hint of improper trading is going to be questioned very thoroughly.

Back to lurking. I really appreciate the insight so many contribute, but man, the longer this goes on, the more angry and frustrated I become with this case, our government and society as a whole that we are even still here. This thing could have been settled long ago, where the big boys would still profit and those individuals who lost so much in the takeover could at least be made partially compensated for their losses. I hope when the time comes, they can somehow be made whole.

icon url

Roach58

08/15/11 3:05 PM

#328497 RE: warcton #328440

"The SNH's have all said that they had non-public information, but it was not "material".

They didn't believe that the information they possessed would have lead other investors to trade differently."





That's pure BS. If any common or preferred shareholder knew absolutely (because it was destined to be part of the GSA)that their class would be cancelled, there would be no one trading those classes besides daytraders and flippers, and the PPS would likely be much lower than it is now and would have gotten to that level sooner and stayed there or dropped more. I agree with fsshon, I'd have moved my investment to whatever least impaired class I could afford to play.That's the power of having that info which the SNH a-holes did.IMO
icon url

investorhub123

08/15/11 6:45 PM

#328548 RE: warcton #328440

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't there a good bit of evidence not shown in court hearing, for the judges eyes only (i.e. trading records) that show the hedgies in the wrong?.......Why would they agree to give Equity anything(back in May) if there were not guilty......