InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

my2Mustangs

08/09/11 2:09 AM

#14008 RE: Dodah #14003

So you're saying that a public supported university such as Missouri State or NC State wouldn't disclose what tax money, tuitions, donations by alumni is spent on researching and what is being researched?

I wasn't concerned about the university because a university has never been mentioned in any PR for INOL that I can remember. I was surprised that the interviewer even asked about a university being involved because Gary has never PRd any involvement with a university for INOL. In 2009 he claimed an involvement with a university, but that was "cancer research for companion animals" and another public company that Gary had. He kept raising the A/S at that one for "acquisitions" and other such roadapples too.


Do you think there is a reason for Gary to not disclose the name of the "accredited lab" that processes the tests? Alot of other web-sites that sell DNA tests name the lab.

What reason(s) can you come up with as to why Gary has a gag order on the TA?
icon url

Slojab

08/09/11 10:22 AM

#14012 RE: Dodah #14003

I've been clear on my opinion all along that INOL should not exist. It's function and sole purpose for existence should be contained within InoHealth.

Gary set it up in order to raise cash through the public markets to sell a product he couldn't sell through his private company.

Since this business model can't succeed on it's merits, it's reasonable to conclude he set it up to fail.

My opinions.