Replies to post #17773 on Greenshift Corporation (GERS)

[Joe1979]

Thanks for the update Slash!!!

I intend on buying before and after the R/S... The long term investment looks more and more promising as things continue to come to light.

Joe

[nobody12378]

Slash,

Are you willing to wade into the discussion of 1000:1 versus 10:1? Why the former when the latter would easily satisfy the stated objectives for the R/S?

[stockerme]

You would think that the mystery ethanol companies would put out a PR for their own companies - unless they are "forced" participants.

[Olie77]

Great to hear from you - i'll cancel the search party!
Excellent post-thank you.

[DHOLE]

Thank Goodness you are back!

[jlglex]

Ah, now the problem is "short term growing pains", is it?

Then why are we still litigating with the counterparties to our two disasterous acquisitions from years long past?

Sustainable Systems in Montana. NextGen.

Still spending money on Kevin's favorite lawyers on those, aren't we?

Which raises the question, by the way, which lawyers and accountants got all those nice juicy fees on the NextGen Acquisition and the Sustainable Acquisition? Were they also KK's buddies from Brandeis, like his financiers at YAGI?

And, why is the litigation dragging on so much from those acquisitions? KK letting his lawyer buddies run up the tab? Hey, why not? His stock is non-diluteable. He can always shaft the Common by issuing more shares. Anything for the old boys from Brandies.

These aren't "short term growing pains". These are festering, long term problems; stemming from an unethical and inept CEO; his financing, lawyer, and accountant buddies; and his complete disregard for the interests of the Common Stockholders who have put more than $113 Million into this Company.

It is all becoming very clear to me now that GERS is cash flow positive.

[Olie77]

Slash, Are Utica Energy, LLC and Didion Ethanol current GERS customers or just potential customers in your opinion?