Where are you getting those numbers? Is there some documented report or just off the PR by the company. The field is not getting anything close to that 20 bpd and I really doubt that it will. Not on any 30 day basis anyway. And there is doubts that it has a reserve anywhere near the amount the company has PR'd. It's almost a given that any pinky PR is over stated and one must take that fact in view when certain projections are given.
At any rate, whatever the bpd is or will be has to be shown on documented reports, so will be interesting to watch for that.
Where are the costs coming from. Are they expenses from any audited financials of BNPD? Or are there any links to verifiable data confirming that maybe what it should be or is. Of course, some wells don't do as well as others when it comes to getting the last of the oil out and expense to operate low producing wells are considerably more than better producing wells in relationship of expense per barrel of oil.
Also lets be clear on what exactly "ownership" is when it is "working interest".
We're still missing a couple of numbers and terms of this 25% "working interest". It would be nice and have some real disclosure and transparency by BNPD and let us in on ALL the terms.
Also it is only 25% of low producing wells and the fact that "exploration, development, and operating costs" are payments to Tejone Operating Corp by BNPD shareholders along with the shareholders are the ones who will pay for the 25% "working interest".