Loop Fair Enough I Agree (mostly)
1. We fully agree. You and I and danny (and I think many others);
2. I didn't say or mean to imply that you did--my comments were in part general;
3. I DO recognize and have posted to the same effect that but for HC I don't think our 2G IP would have any value and there is some doubt as to whether the company would have survived period;
4. I don't fully agree here that HC "deserves" to be at the helm to take NOK to the mat--it sure doesn't matter to me whether he is there or not so long as NOK IS taken to the mat--and I am NOT invested in irritating anyone or seeing anyone get their just rewards--I AM invested in this stock to make $$$ not see others get revenge;
5. As I said, I AM going to sit back and see what HC does for me now and will judge him on his performance from today until the next time he's up--if he's still around;
So for the most part we agree and I can happilly agree to disagree about anything else! Thanks for your response!
Regards
Loophole73 wrote: "Hardball
1. I have stated before that declassifying is a great idea once a company has attained a true value.
2. I did not say HC should go on forever either.
3. If you do not recognize that the accomplishments over the last nine years are the reason that we are waiting on what we believe will be a successful final arbitration award, then we just have to agree to disagree.
4. Continuity is important to me and the man deserves to be at the helm when Nok is taken to the mat. It is my belief that he will go after this accomplishment unless he decides to stick around just to irritate shareholders who are still popping off after a major increase in the share price has occurred.
5. The election is over and I do not want to dwell in the past. Sit back and watch what HC will do for you NOW.
MO
loop"