Replies to post #30137 on Wanderport Corp (WDRP)

[water boy]

I see your point. I see that they may have to be cautious on what they would say about the guy.

Having said that, whatever approaches or fashions the firm would have to do, we will be much better off to later telling new investors that this guy is gone.

[n1tr08urner]

You have a good point for sure but there is a very big difference between "nothing was proven, we are certainly investigating everything and will make a decision once we have more information" and what they said which was "he's great, nothing happened, things stay as they were and how dare the AMF say anything bad about the company". They could have struck a far far better balance between reassuring investors that they take these allegations very seriously and at the same time not washing their laundry in public and jumping to any conclusions about Andrew.

[floridagrl25]

What should the company have done? To put it simply ..... not praised him. Keeping it simple and sticking to only the facts would have been a smarter decision on their part. They chose not to do that. Get my drift now? Obviously we disagree on that, but that's ok.