I understood the implied NO in your first post. And I agree with much of what you have said. I also think WDRP has come this far with zero dilution to pay for IR work by issuing somewhat restricted shares. Everything about WDRP so far has checked out by many investors. And we all have questioned the strength of the PRs. But you have to admit,,Robert has not given much to present as multimedia worthy. We have a start up with very private technology in the birthing process. What part of that can you just bust out a huge PR about? We are not selling widgets with a new improved double action switch that you can demonstrate for the investors. Bottom line is Andrew may not be a great IR guy but he has not to my knowledge been untruthful. And being an American I want to see his charges and some proof before I convict him. And personally I applaud WDRP for their present stance as it relates to Andrew. I do not however wish to sit and wait with no information thru next week regarding the web site and where we stand with the (UL) testing or what Andrews charges are. I think now is a great opportunity for WDRP to turn on the charm and win huge support with a little transparency since all eyes are on them.
I am thru for the weekend. Going out on the pontoon boat to have a smoke and a drink and enjoy my wife. I hope all of us will take some time this weekend to enjoy the fact that we can play this game. GLTA 2ez
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
