Sure doesn't sound like much of an explanation to me. I am curious as to whether or not Brown ever told you one of two things: 1) That Expo Holdings, Inc. knew they could have superseded that filing with an amended filing to clarify the situation officially for all shareholders but refused to do so because of the relatively irrelevant expense or 2) that they felt it was a "harmless error" and despite the incredible fiscal damages it directly caused to some shareholders, feel that filing such a blatantly misleading amendment gave them no liability in that matter whatsoever?
It has been shown through corporate actions repeatedly that Expo Holdings, Inc. has little or no regard for their common shareholder's financial concerns and that management seems to believe and express through almost each and every one of those inept corporate actions their belief that the company is still basically the personal property of Brown and Harrs. Despite the fact that Brown and Harrs are less than 6% shareholders in Expo together (assuming they still haven't "even ONCE sold a single share" as has been claimed). All IMHO.