Replies to post #9017 on First American Scientific Corp. (fka FASC)

[Setonian]

Really TR....did you know after reading subsequent 10Ks, that the two other machines sold to VIRC were never ever used. I would consider that tidbit of information much more valuable then a report from the company trying to portray itself in a viable manner.

Product performance is what makes or breaks a company and not a somewhat rosy report discussing potential sales of KDS that if/when are placed we'll never hear about them again.

How's the Malaysias KDS, Firma Codogni KDS, or even better what's up with the Princeton Plant. Those are the real issues that are never ever resolved TR, no matter how many 10Ks are published.

You said you "rely" heavily on SEC reposrts, would you recommend someone buying some of FASC after reading the last report???

[Jagman]

TRCPA, Honeywell was mentioned in many of the FASC SEC filings, that didn't mean squat. I doubt the SEC even reads the FASC filings let alone compare each to previous filings, so much for an "oversight body". That's like saying the NYC police dept. will protect you at all times when you visit NYC.

I hope the "fourth contract signed awaiting deposit" isn't with Honeywell! Pay attention to the pps, the market will let you know what the FASC "potential" is all about even before you read the next filing! LOL!