Acc...you're wasting your time. The Expo SEC filings "don't count" as "proof". Only unvetted, impossible to prove, private phone calls from proven bald-face liars at the company are substantial enough "evidence" to prove who was/is and who wasn't/isn't a 10% EXPH shareholder. Especially when that is the only source of information that fits a conspiracy theory bizarre and stupid enough to possibly explain away evidence of an incriminating circumstance with Expo's management. Note as well that "impossible to correct" (supersede) filings are suddenly able to be easily superseded "later" when they aren't/weren't available to the public and just "known" to a, errr, **few** via super unvetted insider "DD", LMAO. IMHO.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
