InvestorsHub Logo

BRIG_88

07/10/11 10:24 AM

#118447 RE: Artiztic1 #118446

Rofl! Now it's back to the cash burn rate? Wellllll since Rawnoc proved your last assessment of 17 million was drivel.....i think lovethatgreen pretty much has what's going here pegged.....not worth discussing....

Rawnoc

07/10/11 12:08 PM

#118459 RE: Artiztic1 #118446

P2O net loss was $1.2 million which included $300k in R&D expenses and other contruction expenses and solid waste permit expenses (big bucks to Islechem). In short, it ain't much for a Q with zero fuel sales but production was indeed going on. Like I said, you have to literally make up expenses to make P2O look expensive to run.

$1.2 million net loss including lots of one-timers and R&D and $1.2 million in cash burn is a far cry from your $17 million claim, though I applaud you for bringing that fake number down to a lesser fake cash burn number of $3 million.