basically the objection (at least that portion) is saying insinuating IMO that pretty much everyone EXCEPT the EC is on the up and up in every aspect of the insider trading issue and the wording of what I highlighted goes even further to comppliment the debtor's attorneys (Rosen).
This case is becoming more bitter by the minute, although I beleive that when they are in court they will play nice.
I have this weird feeling in the back of my head, that all the attorneys are basically acting out a play or something and we think it is real. Somewhere down the road, they will all say something like "shareholders have been punked" and they will all laugh all the way to the bank.
Is this board having representation at the hearings the next few days? Gosh I hope so. The play by play good be very intriguing.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
