InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Slojab

06/22/11 10:03 AM

#11881 RE: gabbyco #11879

"they"? You do realize that "they" are the Berthold's, right?

And "they" would prefer the majority of revs go to the coffers of their private company, right?

So, while I don't expect INOL will get zero revs in the split, I don't imaging it'll be much more than that.

But you could call and ask.

After all, you'd think that due to the incestuous relationship they have with InolHealth, they'd be extra careful to be transparent about this.

Yet, I've heard nothing about it.
icon url

apprenante

06/22/11 10:11 AM

#11884 RE: gabbyco #11879

Well, they didn't do it for free...

How do you know?

Tell us how to verify that InoHealth has SOLD products. Shipping products means nothing; the products could have been shipped on consignment. And although INOL claims credit for shipping products to Gulf Coast, which company paid for the shipment, INOL or InoHealth? Show us how to confirm that.

Tell us how to confirm the revenue stream that INOL has derived from InoHealth sales. So far, despite InoHealth's "success," INOL's SEC filings continue to show NO sales revenue.

Apprenante
icon url

KELLYCO

06/22/11 10:17 AM

#11886 RE: gabbyco #11879

""INOL has nothing more than a marketing contract with an unknown revenue stream.

Well, they didn't do it for free... ""

They are doing it to sell shares and probably stick INOL with Inohealth product that will never be sold for much of a profit if at all.