InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BigOwl47

06/16/11 5:17 PM

#155621 RE: Biochemist2002 #155536

Bio, If we were looking at "AUDITED" Financials from KATX, we would not be having this discussion. One of two things is true.

If the Nevada SOS website is correct about the 980,000,000 Authorized Share change, then the KATX Financial info presented to the OTC-Markets is in error.

If the KATX Financial info presented to the OTC-Markets is correct, then the Nevada SOS website for KATX is in error.

I also note that the KATX page on the Nevada SOS website is showing that KATX is in "DEFAULT." That, according to the Nevada SOS, means that the KATX business license in the state of Nevada has not been paid. Plus (apparently) the list of Officers required to be filed as of 7-31-2010 is now almost a year overdue. The credibility of the Nevada SOS info must be questioned for accuracy under the current set of circumstances.

Additionally, I have heard of prior cases of third parties who are in no way connected with the company (in this case KATX) surepticiously making a change in a company's website info with a false filing over the internet and paid with an anonymous (Possibly stolen) credit card. I am not saying that such a thing has happened here, but something is wrong with some of the info filed on KATX behalf.