InvestorsHub Logo

sf

06/14/11 8:27 PM

#308487 RE: sf #308481

and 2 bil in assets have to be forked back over by barclays to lehman also. lehman was the sacrificial lamb to, and rival of goldman just like wamu was the sacrificial lamb to, and rival of jpmorgan. coincidence? i think not. alot of assets are hidden in both cases. goldman and jpig dont want this info out or they turn bk imo. why do you think jpig keeps saying they are cash rich? but they never say who's cash they are rich with! and lehmans case moved up six months to june? coincidence again? i think not! more money just keeps floating to the surface.....stolen money and assets that have to be valued because fdic, gs,jpig all got caught with their hands in the cookie jar. and here comes our main man susman....he is merger man in chief. lehman is a perfect fit for wamu whether whole or pick and choose only the assets wmi needs. but why let an opprtunity pass that no one else can touch while in bk. wmi can merge holding companies in bk and i feel that is what is taking so long. susman puting a big red bow on the surprise new merged co imo.

VivaLasVegas

06/14/11 8:54 PM

#308491 RE: sf #308481

Barclays on the 4B.
That's why the common went nuts the other day.

I'll double check the FDIC.


My whole premise on these 2 different but incredibly similar situations is this-
There was GRAND THEFT FINANCIAL AUTO that took place, and if we can hold the crooks hands to the fire long enough, maybe they'll cough up a settlement, but it's gotta be hardball, TOTAL WORLD EXPOSURE IF YOU DON'T PAY THE PIPER HANDSOMELY.

No pussyfooting around.
This is the big leagues and they play dirty.
You've got truth on the side of WaMu and Lehman,,, (not to say they were angels LOL) but you have to be willing to beat back everyone and ESPECIALLY THE BOND A-HOLES. These jackwagons think they can pull a K-Mart.

Bull F'N SHEEEEEET ---- " NOT UP IN HERE, NOT UP IN HERE!!!!!! "