Replies to post #38157 on AppTech Payments Corp (APCX)

[benosufan]

I disagree. Shareholders want him to be truthful and upfront in what he is doing. If he needs to sell shares to acquire a business then fine but to sell shares and not disclose terms of agreements is wrong IMO. Did you know there are other ways to sell shares to accrue capital? Selling them as cheap paper really hurts the shareholder.

How will you feel if a r/s is done?

[jmurfk]

That is a poor comparison. Most responsible/smart businesses don't max out their lines of credit. They use some, repay, and so on. When used smartly, a large portion is left for emergencies. Nothing with APCX is an emergency.

Also, shareholders didn't, and don't expect companies to max out there AS. There is only one person here who is overjoyed that their investment was diluted to the ground.

Also, gimme a break on "shareholders" are happy with dilution.

Anyone with a basic understanding of the English language, knows exactly what that "no concern about dilution" statement meant. Following that PRd statement, the "shareholders" and paid promoter here were using it to refute claims about the ongoing dilution. So, you are way off in your claims about shareholders knowing what it meant.

[oilin07]

cpw13154 its easy to tell someone who disagrees to go find another company to invest in. Unfortunately this type of misleading behavior from the company started to come out while the stock was being dilluted, so a large number of shareholders are "stuck" here because they invested at a much higher price. I'm sure if they were even close to getting their money back they would have already. I'm just curious but what is your relation to the CEO?

[jmurfk]

I am sure he assumed most smart people understood when the ss went to 7.5 billion that he was going to use this money to purchase buisness ventures which enhance the company

So, you still have these same thoughts with the AS at 16 billion now? Do you still hope he uses it up all the AS?