InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

old_schooler

06/10/11 11:39 AM

#25286 RE: Pockets #25285

The MM's are making sure there is no retail buying ahead of the Disclosure. They are scared to death of a huge uncontrollable run that the CEO has been masterminding against the short attack on his company.

Why would someone/entity consistently be dropping big blocks below last price when buyers are hitting at a higher ask?

If there were dilution, the seller meters shares into the ask, they do not drop blocks below last price. What would that accomplish for the seller, besides less money?

No, I think the naysayers are wrong and only want to beat the company up so they can try to buy shares on the cheap and then off them for a small gain.

Some just bought high and are crying about it.



icon url

ccwilloe

06/10/11 12:30 PM

#25292 RE: Pockets #25285

this is correct reasoning pockets.
elimination of shares is the ONLY thing left that can possible eliminate the short positions BY FORCE.
the truth is that black's making a good salary at his job and the stock he owns is really an insignificant part of his income. because of this, his ownership of X number of shares has very little impact on his lifestyle and if the PPS goes into qudruple zeros, it's no big deal since he is already financially secure.

ihn other words, it would seem like he would have vested interest in the stock PPS and it if did sudenly reverse, that's great icing on the cake for him.... but he's not too concerned since he's already pulling in a nice income from the company's fundamental income.

as far as the investors, it's no skin off his back if the PPS fails - since the company does not need income from the sale of stock anyways - he can just let it do what it's going to do.... erode.

look, the 2's are now stable.
the 3's were stable last week - but now the 2's are stable.

1's are next up to bat.