InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

maddawg1

06/02/11 8:37 PM

#114138 RE: scottmac711 #114135

GOOD POST!
icon url

TruthInTime

06/02/11 8:58 PM

#114142 RE: scottmac711 #114135

Welcome to Ihub new poster. I in no way see how an RS would be a good thing, I find it amusing to be reading those words, its as if "the forces that be" intended to soften the blow, but an RS would be just that a blow to those who have invested in this "New Ballgame" as they were told when this stock was at .0007 .001 and higher. So I don't follow, and if indeed an RS happened you can bet it will get diluted back to these levels. Selling shares is their game, not tea or atomic dog, or pirate punch, or little muffins. Selling SHARES is how they live the good life on your dime.


They're Crooks!


Nice try though...



Truth.
icon url

Realityhurts

06/02/11 9:36 PM

#114151 RE: scottmac711 #114135

On the contrary, rs'ing would mean that HFBG would lose basically all the interest it has from traders and investors. Take a look at any stock that rs'd, none, get renewed interest until they have fallen basically back to subpenny levels. The idea that it would open new eyes to the stock is a complete myth that people who go through and RS like to believe. All to often, it's what management says, even as, they know it's a giant screw you to shareholders. HFBG will receive much more interest and liquidity here at subpenny levels than it ever will at higher ones. I would like to believe that management realizes that fact. If they rs'd, they would doom themselves to no more interest ever from OTC traders. It would be the death of the company.


Judging by their own statements however, they realize that. If they reneged on the promise of no RS in 2011, it would be a sad day for them, and, for all here. I certainly do hope that for their sake, they don't. Could be the start of something good for them, and for us if they choose the honorable way of building the pps.