InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

grantg2

05/26/11 1:05 PM

#110037 RE: jimmenknee #110036

What's even more difficult is to understand the twisting and turnings of information presented here...


<"Hard to post anything real that could be construed as controversial without receiving a chuckle and a label...

the point is the post's average slant is favorable to neutral, whereas the data points to unfavorable to neutral.

And yes by moving shares to beneficiaries who do not have to report holdings, there will be no further understanding of the disposition;

however, Mr. Wesson also moved shares into his direct control. The speculation as to the purpose is not conspiratorial in nature. It does however, go against the grain of insider ownership proving confidence in JBI. I see it as someone who has suggested a need to supplement income-- nothing wrong with that"
>

I guess Mr. Wesson has been labeled a nefarious man! I gather that I am to conclude he is UP to SOMETHING. But it is not quite clear to me.

*chuckle*
icon url

BRIG_88

05/26/11 1:10 PM

#110038 RE: jimmenknee #110036

Nah...Wesson has bought a ton of shares and still has them....he's on the BOD and knows JBII is going to the moon.....he's going to be extremely wealthy as a result...doesn't matter where he puts them shares are shares.....
icon url

tykundegex

05/26/11 1:10 PM

#110039 RE: jimmenknee #110036

And holding all those shares from $7.70 down to $0.52 doesn't show confidence in JBI?

How do you explain him not selling any up until now?


"It does however, go against the grain of insider ownership proving confidence in JBI"
icon url

Johnik

05/27/11 12:42 AM

#110289 RE: jimmenknee #110036

jimmenknee, jimmenknee, jimmenknee...

Your posts of late reflect a fundamental misapprehension of the nature of trusts. I implore you to visit your local library and read up on what a trust is, how a trust operates, and what the trustees' duties are with respect to the trust.

And yes by moving shares to beneficiaries who do not have to report holdings, there will be no further understanding of the disposition;

however, Mr. Wesson also moved shares into his direct control. The speculation as to the purpose is not conspiratorial in nature. It does however, go against the grain of insider ownership proving confidence in JBI. I see it as someone who has suggested a need to supplement income



First, and most fundamentally, a trustee must act in accordance with the trust instrument. A trust does not continue with no end (look up "rule against perpetuities"), but rather must be managed and distributed pursuant to the trust terms. You seem to assume that the trustee's powers are limitless, when they are anything but.

You next appear to suggest that, by obtaining shares through a trust distribution, the trustee is then free to sell the shares at whim. In actuality, the shares held in the director's personal account are subject to somewhat greater SEC scrutiny upon disposition. The reason is that, once the fiduciary bond terminates with respect to the trust, the director has full discretion over the sale or exchange of the stock. Such discretion carries with it greater obligations in terms of SEC compliance, not to mention the director's continuing duty with respect to the corporation.

It bears noting that this transfer to the director's own account has not been followed by a reported sale of the stock by the director--a point which directly contradicts your implied assertion that this move was done by the director to obtain supplemental income. If I misunderstood your rather cryptic message about a director's direct control of stock going "against the grain of insider ownership proving confidence in JBI" then by all means clarify.

The one point I readily concede that you made correctly is that a shareholder (whether a former beneficiary or otherwise) is not subject to the same reporting requirements as a director or other insider. No surprise there.

Have a nice weekend....
icon url

d2006s

05/27/11 11:38 AM

#110449 RE: jimmenknee #110036

jimmenkee

why don't you contact Mr. Wesson directly instead of making WAG's about what HIS family trust is doing.

just a thought.