What's even more difficult is to understand the twisting and turnings of information presented here...
<"Hard to post anything real that could be construed as controversial without receiving a chuckle and a label...
the point is the post's average slant is favorable to neutral, whereas the data points to unfavorable to neutral.
And yes by moving shares to beneficiaries who do not have to report holdings, there will be no further understanding of the disposition;
however, Mr. Wesson also moved shares into his direct control. The speculation as to the purpose is not conspiratorial in nature. It does however, go against the grain of insider ownership proving confidence in JBI. I see it as someone who has suggested a need to supplement income-- nothing wrong with that">
I guess Mr. Wesson has been labeled a nefarious man! I gather that I am to conclude he is UP to SOMETHING. But it is not quite clear to me.
*chuckle*