Well there you go, you feel you are not better off today than you were 1 week ago. Working behind the scenes is what most of us have been doing, the only think it got us was Nate getting some traction. I didn't have anything to do with that.. But, I did have something to do with Hoffman..
So I am better off now than I was 1 week ago. Didn't your dad teach you about how the "powers that be" operate? You want to sue as a shareholder outside of BK, have at it, you will not get any traction and you have an EC that represents you. If you wanted to change that, you should have applied for it, you would have made a good member. I like your tenacity, but when the estate is tapped out and the creditors are starting to be affected to a point of losing money on their claims, well the Judge has to listen because in Bankruptcy her concern is the creditors. Tha decreases recovery 'if any' to commons and preferreds..
Commons equity is at the bottom of the ladder and this ladder is breaking apart at the top. So, it is a good idea to follow the EC's recommendation and let the appreciation of value in RE-WMI make your shares much more valuable in the long run...
Or you can be here in one year, griping about how Susman is not saying anything, Willingham is impotent, JPM is a crrok, FDIC is a FRAUD and this case is quagmire, because that is exactly what it is! 4 new members could have easily overruled the Chair, but it loooks like they learned what we already knew, to keep the equity train on the tracks, we have to look to the future.
~Don~