Replies to post #235038 on Green Energy Enterprises Inc. (GYOG)

[Sharktnk]

Secondly, there were some outrageous claims made here that attempted to refute me. I, just love the two claimers that supposedly called James O in the weeee hours of the A.M to question him about the stock exchange i.e PP.

Do you really want to keep this up? Make it real easy for you. You supposedly have access to James, ask him if he received an *email late last night and if he responded to it.

*email - Its a form of communication for those who have a significant grasp of the English language and primary computer skills.

Edit - My apologies, I didn't take into account the denisty level ... More specifically, if he received an email with your quotes in it from myself and if he responded to it.

[Sharktnk]

Thirdly, there was one individual insulating that I was throwing James under the bus.

Missed that one but an astute observation it was.

[MAJORXVII]

Kwan, kwan, kwan, kwan,...

please provide proof

We'll be waiting for that proof,...

(And just in case we all exchange our QASP shares before you present the proof, don't worry, we'll be alright...)

[Sharktnk]

Fourthly, for you to insert your opinion about my knowledge to the facts, please provide proof. One thing for certain about me I don't have to hope, or guess the outcome. For a Fact I Know, so we will all see come later today whose lying and whose not.

Alas Mr. Kwan Straughn, the onus is on you to present proof. You brought it forward, you prove it, or does that also make you uncomfortable?

Bring it forth, you are so assure of yourself. Give us some court documents, the docket seems to be almost a week behind.

Prove it Kwan.

[decouverte d Elbe]

Tell me who financed the NHSH shell.
And i'll tell you if you are full of &^%(

[BLTN]

Kwan made some absolutely outrageous claims here last night. The court situation was just one. How would he possibly know what went on in court? Was he there? No. Is he the spokeperson for the courts? No Is he the spokesperson for the judge? No again. Therefore, I can only conclude that his opinion came from someone who clearly has a side in this. Speaking only for me, that's hardly an opinion I'd trust but others can choose to do as they may.

Sir, the burden of proof is CLEARLY on you. You are the one who has injected himself into this discussion on a public message board.

Your comments are WITHOUT basis at this point and again I ask you "how in the world you would know what went on in the court WITHOUT having been there? You have been fed information from someone with a strong opinion, which speaks to BIAS, not facts. The judge has made NO decision at this point in time, so why do you speak for him???"

Maybe Kwan needs to tell everyone who he works for and what his role here is?

Many here have lost alot of money being in QASP yet here you ride onto the scene to 'save' people?! Pardon me for being sensible but I have to question who you work for. What role do you have in this? What kind of payday are you hoping for out of this and at whose expense?

Remember, you are the one who felt the need to come to this board and speak for a judge and for Mr. Owens. I have a hunch they are both men who can do that for themselves quite well. GLTA