InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

hasher

05/10/05 11:34 AM

#165592 RE: RDG013 #165590

their interpretation is 100% incorrect

icon url

Sec 10

05/10/05 11:46 AM

#165597 RE: RDG013 #165590

RDG-the DTCC/NSCC provide numbers every day related to "naked shorting." It's called the SHO threshold list. CMKX isn't on it.


QED
icon url

janice shell

05/10/05 12:13 PM

#165600 RE: RDG013 #165590

Unfortunately that's not gonna fly. It's ridiculous. You seriously believe that the judge is prepared to change the universally accepted definition of "shares outstanding" merely to accommodate CMKX's need to make enough excuses to continue trading?

I don't.

Their interpration of the O/S is that it accounts for all outstanding shares, not just shares issued and outstanding from the company.
icon url

BullNBear52

05/10/05 12:19 PM

#165602 RE: RDG013 #165590

That is the wrong interpretation of the O/S as it relates to a balance sheet filing. The TA knows that number as it relates to the company. No one and no company includes and reports naked shares as outstanding on their SEC filings.