InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

hardyheads

05/09/11 11:20 PM

#17402 RE: rebelcork #17401

rebelcork..who`s we..

in your post you state..
But that's our take on SVMI

who`s your team of haters feeding you this information.why do you insist on dragging down SVMI
icon url

DFW

05/10/11 5:33 AM

#17406 RE: rebelcork #17401

Sorry what you wrote clears up nothing. In fact what you write and have written the last few months are about as clear as mud.

Here are the highlights of what this company you seem to defend is dealing with now on just one of the many investigations that the SEC is forgoing with this company:

Cobalis v Yorkville Advisors charged with R I C O
THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1961(a) – [R.I.C.O.]
Contributor: Law Offices of Gregory Grantham SUMMARY: This 10 count complaint filed upon Hedge fund YORKVILLE Capital (YAGI)provides great detail on market manipulation that Cobalis Corp claims in a $100,000,000.00 dollar damage complaint for:

1. Breach of Securities Purchase Agreement

2. Breach of Debenture Agreement

3. Violation of Rule 10-b-5

4. Violation of Section 17(a)(1) of the Exchange Act

5. Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1961(a) – [R.I.C.O.]

6. Unjust Enrichment & Restitution

7. Declaratory & Injunctive Relief

8. Unfair Business Practices

9. Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic Relations

http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=41cc3ff9-9b16-43db-b885-5c9bc2577677



In fact from the time a certain employee has been released from Savi you have been slinging nothing but mud.

As far as the ownership of Cornell maybe you can explain to me why in your words this fine upstanding company has left the United States and the majority ownership is now domiciled in the Grand Cayman Islands?

====================

Your statement

Whether YA wishes to just hold the shares and direct the company, take it over or run it though a new board remains to be seen.



If you read the agreement between YA/Cornell and Savi you will see that those warrants can not be exercised more than 5% of the overall
stock issued and outstanding at any one time although that agreement is null and void because Cornell never completed the terms of the agreement and all that really exists after July is a simple loan.

As far as other info concerning Cornell, SEC and Savi I have been privileged to more info for longer, in facts years before you even knew who Savi was. Once again you are grabbing for straws to defame Serge and Savi.