InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

EMTPstock

05/09/11 11:02 AM

#382 RE: GWMAN #381

GWMAN, just a thought. I feel like your tune has changed a little. You and I both have caught heat on this board for suggesting that they need to make a deal or we are bailing at some point in the near future. Your last few posts have defended Valcent, and defended them well.

Is this a change of heart? Have you read or come accross new info? Do you still have a timeline for your investment that is fast approaching?

Again, I am just curious on your thoughts, you and I have been on the same side of an argument many times.
icon url

Memdicht

05/09/11 11:03 AM

#383 RE: GWMAN #381

It would seem that some people choose not to see the obvious!

Whilst you may not be concerned about the remuneration of the officers of the company, it DOES raise questions to me when a significant bonus is paid given the non existent sales of the company.

It is absolutley not conjecture regarding the people who are no longer with Valcent and there has been other discussion threads that are directly related to this subject by others here.

As for the rest of your response....you may think it to be "crazy, baseless crap" but I can only go by what I see and what I can collate from the public domain and forums like this. I would be delighted for you to prove me wrong and show me the sales. The company has repeatedly made announcements that have later proven to be optimisitic at best and downright false at worst. Take at look through the historic "press releases" for the evidence on public record.

Yes, I am negative given the history of Valcent to date. When there is something positive to report, then I will be the first to issue compliments. Until such time, I will remain watching as a concerned but powerless shareholder from the sidelines.

I accept that many scenarios are possible and that there are several ways of interpreting the limited information available so I could well be completely wrong. Time will tell.