InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 21
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/19/2011

Re: GWMAN post# 381

Monday, 05/09/2011 11:03:06 AM

Monday, May 09, 2011 11:03:06 AM

Post# of 932
It would seem that some people choose not to see the obvious!

Whilst you may not be concerned about the remuneration of the officers of the company, it DOES raise questions to me when a significant bonus is paid given the non existent sales of the company.

It is absolutley not conjecture regarding the people who are no longer with Valcent and there has been other discussion threads that are directly related to this subject by others here.

As for the rest of your response....you may think it to be "crazy, baseless crap" but I can only go by what I see and what I can collate from the public domain and forums like this. I would be delighted for you to prove me wrong and show me the sales. The company has repeatedly made announcements that have later proven to be optimisitic at best and downright false at worst. Take at look through the historic "press releases" for the evidence on public record.

Yes, I am negative given the history of Valcent to date. When there is something positive to report, then I will be the first to issue compliments. Until such time, I will remain watching as a concerned but powerless shareholder from the sidelines.

I accept that many scenarios are possible and that there are several ways of interpreting the limited information available so I could well be completely wrong. Time will tell.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.