InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BuzzOnDaBeach

05/09/05 11:43 PM

#165491 RE: DiamondTrader1 #165484

IMO, that's really grasping at straws, but you are certainly entitled to your opinion. However, they got caught in a lie regarding the number of shareholders, there was always the possibility that the sec would do nothing, and there is a tremendous risk that the evidence would never be admitted. So I really believe that's long shot reasoning. There would be more effective and guaranteed ways to get this in front of a judge. However, you are entitled to your opinion, and I to mine, for the time being, lol. We will know soon enough.

GLTY, and thank you for the reasonable reply.

Buzz

icon url

janice shell

05/10/05 12:10 AM

#165503 RE: DiamondTrader1 #165484

Wooooooooo.

To bait the SEC into a hearing. It's a gamble, but a better one than simply crying foul while the SEC and their lapdogs do nothing.

By not filing, they bring the issue centerstage. Now it's up to the legal team to slay shorty while they've drawn him into the ring.

icon url

hasher

05/10/05 12:17 AM

#165507 RE: DiamondTrader1 #165484

"To bait the SEC into a hearing"

there seems to be lots of turnip trucks around here. Even Zen won't buy that one