William, the only thing I really know about SG's strategy is what they post on their website. IMO, they are following it to a T. You may be right about Seth Ard's work, but I felt that he did a very good job in one of the recent hearings, and I am confident in him having access to more experienced colleagues in the firm who likely supervise his work. I did not, and don't plan to, vote on this matter. I understand that many posters have grown impatient and have become cynical and untrusting of our advisers and advocates. All I can say is that I retain trust in SG and the EC. PJS has outstanding credentials and a fine reputation. I still believe that we are in very good hands and it is important to maintain a positive attitude.
One thing, I wonder what you and others think about our chance of prevailing in a SH meeting and if we indeed have sufficient votes there.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
