InvestorsHub Logo

BigBadWolf

04/30/11 1:59 PM

#8072 RE: ThePplsVoice #8071

The company told me that their thousands of shareholders are not complaining about the delay, and understand it.

They informed me that not one single shareholder is up in arms about this.

The "ONLY" people that seem to be focused/obsessed with it, are not even shareholders. The company pointed out their obligations are to shareholders and shareholders only.



so according to the quote above that the company knows aliases but better yet is sharing with you the names of & number of shareholders off of the NOBO report, which by the way is illegal & a direct SEC vilolation unless you are saying that you are beneficial owner in awsl. their is also a list called the OBO list http://www.kattenlaw.com/nobo/

A shareholder is a NOBO by default, unless he or she has taken affirmative steps to object.

“Street name” holders are those shareholders who hold their shares through a broker or bank custodian. Under this form of ownership, the shares are technically “owned” by the broker, bank or other intermediary, so that only the broker or bank knows the identity of its client, the true beneficial holder

which takes much more time access & several thousand $$$ more to pull & it is the only list that will give you or the company who relays to you this information as per your quote it appears.

OBO status would reduce the cost of soliciting “street name” shareholders, as costs would continue to include:

the cost of generating the “street name” shareholder list, including technology and personnel to gather the shareholder information from numerous brokers and banks, and the organization and reporting of the collected data (including any start-up costs if the task is undertaken by one or more new entities); and
actual communication costs, including printing, postage and any solicitor costs



& yet even after petitions http://www.sec.gov/rules/petitions/petn4-493.htm the OBO has not been overturned.
Please accept under limited finances it is highly unlikely that the company pulled such & a list & if they did it too would be illegal & an SEC violation to share that with you unless, once again you are admitting to or are classified as a beneficial owner defined by the terms set forth in the state of incorporation

Red Hackle

04/30/11 2:25 PM

#8073 RE: ThePplsVoice #8071

What continues to astound me is the fact that some people on this
board (yourself included) keep trying to give the impression that they have an inside track to remarks made by "Pierre" "Martin" and others on Bay street. As I am sure you know this comes darn close to INSIDE INFORMATION! If, as YOU say, there is information even remotely connected to this company, it should be made available to ALL shareholders.No officer of this company has publicly stated that there is an issue with the OPA! Instead, what we have heard here is IMO a bogus back and forth between posters here and SUPPOSEDLY oficers of AWSL. I have brought this issue up before and have never got a satisfactory answer.

WE ARE NOW COMING INTO THE 5TH. MONTH OF THE SO CALLED "QUIET PERIOD"!! WHEN IS SOMEONE FROM THIS COMPANY GOING TO MAKE A "PUBLIC STATEMENT" REGARDING THE VARIOUS ISSUES CONFRONTING AWSL?? And please don't tell us that they are too busy!!!!

warburg

05/02/11 10:43 AM

#8084 RE: ThePplsVoice #8071

AWSL is a great speculative play / investemnt right now, for anyone who is into making money in penny stock speculative plays, as we wait for those FIT contracts to be released.

This is truly a unique opportunity.

I know for sure that those applications were submitted and i understand what they represent, as some others here appear not to understand WTF this company is all about.

Go back and read last years press releases. This has all been building up to tis moment and the share price is down. This is an awesome opportunity,

A lot of applications were submitted. They have secured a ton of rooftops in Ontario for their solar energy parks. They could announce hundreds of millions of dollars in contracts "any day."

According to the OPA's last press release, the next round of Capacity Allocated Exempt projects will be released "any day".

Im not trying to pump, just calling a spade a spade.

After two years, This is at a total turning point for this company.

To support my above statements, here is the quote and the link to the OPA press release::

The OPA issued a Press Release on February 24 stating; “In the coming weeks, the OPA expects to begin awarding phase three contracts for capacity allocation exempt (CAE) projects (under 500 kilowatts) that applied between June 5, 2010, and December 7, 2010.”

http://fit.powerauthority.on.ca/february-24-2011-second-round-large-scale-renewable-energy-projects

Good luck to all