No why would we question him for working his butt off doing everything he can for the shareholders who have been robbed by brokers who have illegaly naked shorted his companies stock.
The problem is the "brokers who have illegaly naked shorted his companies stock" is just another lie from the cheap conman. The moron(s) running the company have lied about just pretty much every single thing they have done so far. Why anyone would believe some even more stupid and cockamamie story than the last ones from them is just about beyond belief.
How about: "you should most certainly question the actions of confirmed liars who lied about casinos, dividends, retained earnings, T-shirt shop openings, property ownership, and Monkster mergers when they come up with a story that conveniently shifts attention from them to a shadowy conspiracy."
I thought the purpose of a CEO or director of a publicly traded company was to work their butts off building a "business" with a product or service that "exists"?
So far there's nothing that exists so how can he work his butt off doing nothing? I guess lying is work...he's very, very good at it.