InvestorsHub Logo

starfire

04/21/11 9:01 AM

#334729 RE: loanranger #334727

I am not interested in wasting your time or my time since you are not interested in debating this issue....however I'll say this...those 73 pages could possibly contain something embarrassing to the SEC...prime time....

Risicare

04/21/11 9:07 AM

#334732 RE: loanranger #334727

You mean the lack of inclusion was not part of the conspiracy between the SEC, DOJ, FINRA, rival spongemakers, the spice girls and Lance Armstrong to destroy spongetech? You mean that it is just plain case of fraud? Not a chance LOL!

cowtown jay

01/29/15 12:18 AM

#345160 RE: loanranger #334727

Exhibit S was supposed to show SpongeTech issuances starting Dec 2002. It does not. If it did, then you would see that the 12 million shares were actually issued to RME at that time.