InvestorsHub Logo

AznMarkofDaFiji

04/21/11 4:26 AM

#22384 RE: NASCOW #22382

NASCOW, I used to believe you were one of those speculators that shined a light on to EVCA despite the hype. But after that post I feel like you've really gone down the wrong path-basing it off a e-mail of ALL THINGS especially from someone like the poster you mentioned.

A quiet period not based off the SEC? Then why be in the quiet period at all if it's not imposed by the GOVERNMENT?!

I still believe the quiet period is done per SEC, as it is the ONLY reasonable reason a company could be in a "quiet period."

Granted, you mentioned the legitimacy of it has not been verified, the legitimacy of a company being in a quiet period due to inadequate SEC filings is more convincing to me than an attorney saying they should not release filings-simply because more people have reported SEC being involved with a quiet period.


I DO agree that the quiet period has nothing to do with financing or Dezer tho'-although that WOULD be great-it's not something that current or past rumors have hinted to.

Anyways, let's go EVCA! I hope we get some good news out soon :)

-Awaken-

04/21/11 8:38 AM

#22389 RE: NASCOW #22382

"the legitimacy has not been verified". thats all i had to read