InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 83
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/15/2010

Re: NASCOW post# 22382

Thursday, 04/21/2011 4:26:33 AM

Thursday, April 21, 2011 4:26:33 AM

Post# of 43903
NASCOW, I used to believe you were one of those speculators that shined a light on to EVCA despite the hype. But after that post I feel like you've really gone down the wrong path-basing it off a e-mail of ALL THINGS especially from someone like the poster you mentioned.

A quiet period not based off the SEC? Then why be in the quiet period at all if it's not imposed by the GOVERNMENT?!

I still believe the quiet period is done per SEC, as it is the ONLY reasonable reason a company could be in a "quiet period."

Granted, you mentioned the legitimacy of it has not been verified, the legitimacy of a company being in a quiet period due to inadequate SEC filings is more convincing to me than an attorney saying they should not release filings-simply because more people have reported SEC being involved with a quiet period.


I DO agree that the quiet period has nothing to do with financing or Dezer tho'-although that WOULD be great-it's not something that current or past rumors have hinted to.

Anyways, let's go EVCA! I hope we get some good news out soon :)

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.