InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

hestheman

04/18/11 12:32 PM

#3398 RE: ClarkKant #3397

The only email I recall was from the trustee attorney of the estate. He gave a generic response regarding BUTLQ that a typical attorney would give, Nothing negative as I can recall. You are right when you say do your own DD however....because we had a poster on here who claimed he had spoke to the company several times (I believe he must've been bipolar) and gave completely different stories each time. As far as doing my own DD goes, my own DD shows this is a VERY promising shell play out of chap 11. Yes, there was a pump and dump....people thought this was another Q of the moment play, I think it is something more for people that care to do the DD rather than be an impatient Q flipper. Time will tell if i'm right.
icon url

jaydubs

04/18/11 2:53 PM

#3399 RE: ClarkKant #3397

Well let's just say that being a lawyer myself would know that to be untrue, OR the person writing the e-mail (IF) true would be a huge idiot because they could open themselves up to litigation. No response with ANY info other than a one size fits all response is allowed. This is a shell and we all know it. Therefore it is a lottery ticket. IF BUTLQ is used as a RM to a company this would explode in price per share, IF NOT then it is what it is.