The Exhibit M they are referring to is an Exhibit to their basic response. It has not been copied. It is a different Exhibit M than the one posted today.
My question refers to the alleged comment by Goldberg in Exh. M. However, Schedule M of the additional documents is only about a Nokia 3G handset. It has no comment at all about the 3G scope of the agreement supposedly made in error by Goldberg. It is clear from IDCC's licensing page that Nokia's 1999 contract covers 3G products. Can anyone find the supporting documents referencing this alleged conflicting statement by Goldberg?