InvestorsHub Logo

nutinbutdatroof

04/05/11 4:41 PM

#227620 RE: SLO-sider #227617

I wonder how shareholders would feel about a 1:4 R/S merger if QASP again had $10,000,000 in the company coffers


I'm sure the odds for recovering are good or Mr. Owens wouldn't have been so eager to merge.

samplescave

04/05/11 5:27 PM

#227653 RE: SLO-sider #227617

LIKE I SAID OVER AND OVER!!! Dean did nothing Illegal!!!

Immoral? -YES!

Unethical? -ABSOLUTELY!!!

Illegal?

NOPE!

NOT IN THE LEAST!

Remember that pesky little "Forward Looking Statement"
attached to EVERYTHING Dean released???

EVERYTHING DEAN DID WAS ALL LEGAL ACCORDING TO THE SEC RULES AND REGS!!!!

LIKE IT OR NOT, DEAN SCAMMED JEFF AND EVERY QASP SHAREHOLDER THAT BOUGHT INTO THIS STOCK AND LOST MONEY!

JEFF IS JUST GOING TO HAVE PULL UP HIS BIG GIRL PANTIES AND GET OVER IT!!!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

THIS WAS THE "BIG DAY" EVERYONE WAS LOOKING FORWARD TO??????????????

YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



now you like dean? explain please



YOU KNOW I NEVER SAID THAT!

YOU KNOW THAT I HAVE BEEN CALLING QASP A SCAM!

I HAVE ALWAYS DETESTED DEAN BRADLEY, BUT THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS "IT'S A SCAM!!!!

I AM ONLY FOR WHAT EVER STOPS THIS SCAM FROM CONTINUEING!!!

I DON'T CARE WHO IS AT FAULT!

WHAT EVER.......WHO EVER!!!!!!!!!

QASP MUST GET HALTED AND IT WILL!!!!!!!!


please explain fully your position so the lesser minds (mine) can keep up...lol T.



I DON'T CARE WHO IS GUILTY OF WHAT, THE FACT IS, QASP IS A SCAM!

Samps I do believe that forward looking statements only cover a person or entity that is acting in good faith and to the complete extent of their knowledge at the present time. It does not protect them from fraud, or commission of illegal activity. It is NOT a blanket get out of jail free card.



GOOD! THEN PUT DEAN IN JAIL AND ALL THOSE GUILTY, SHUT THIS NO REVENUES, NON-FILING, NON-REPORTING SKULL AND CROSSBONES PILE OF CRAPOLA DOWN AND BE DONE WITH IT!!!

closing 2 acqusition and not able to name the companies to-date is not covered by Forward looking statement.



SURE IT IS, AS LONG AS HE SAID HE WAS GOING TO -OR- SAID THERE WERE PROBLEMS.

Sharktnk

04/05/11 8:57 PM

#227736 RE: SLO-sider #227617

May be a RAT, but a smart rat!



With the antics revealed today, I don't think 'smart' belongs even in the same library let alone the same dictionary.