I’m very well aware, and appreciate, the healthy growth concept versus the rapid growth that can drown companies, but c’mon, if anyone’s been drowning it’s the shareholders, like myself, who’ve been heavily invested for over ten years, and those like my old man for a bit longer (I don’t think we could ever fall into the get rich category at this point, even if SP shot up to $1000 tomorrow). I’m very familiar with the Wave story, strategy, and evolution of this company.
Wave has managed to stay debt free at the expense of diluting my shares many times over, for one, and growth has finally begun to manifest itself only more recently when looking at the entire time horizon of this company. I have stayed long, for over a decade because I believed in the idea. I’m not a basher, on the other hand a realistic supporter, who has been growing weary of what I see as a much less than stellar performance of marketing, and deal closing so far, given the massive amounts of mega breaches exponentially increasing these days. And if the deal closing is progressing much better behind the scenes than what we, the public, can know about, it certainly is not communicated well enough by management, or by the quarterly report figures to make me overly confident (and I know this debate has been going on for a long time, but I think I’m finally picking the camp, in terms of management’s corporate guidance ability {not to be confused with their ability to have grand vision}); that is as share price has hovered in the same place for over a year, while the broader market has more than doubled over the same period.
To insinuate that something like a broad TCG awareness marketing campaign would lead to an unsustainable rapid growth situation that would overwhelm Wave does not speak too highly of management’s ability to anticipate and guide then. I would be more than happy to have my shares diluted once again if I knew it was because of the rapid need of funds to keep up with massive new orders. jmho
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
