InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Student86

03/24/11 11:52 PM

#13032 RE: warburg #13031

How about we get some verification that this company actually has a real product first...... that's the real issue here with this company. Even if they win the court case it doesn't mean shet if they don't have a product, that's the basis of the whole company! And they have still yet to prove they have one single product. It's pretty ridiculous the misinformation, manipulation, distraction used by some on this board to take away from the real issue at hand.... WHERE'S THE PRODUCT we heard about 1.5 years ago?

Still absolutely not a shred of evidence that we have any product at all.... it's sad the scam this management and their cronies have pulled on us shareholders and how they continue to avoid the real issue at hand. These guys are true scumbags who just want to make money off their shell pump and dumps at the expense of their own shareholders. These guys are pretty rotten to say the least and they have shown it time and time again by lying to and ripping off their own shareholders.
icon url

Bklynboy56

03/25/11 6:33 PM

#13034 RE: warburg #13031

"its been some time." Yes, it certainly has, hasn't it.

Out of boredom, curiousity and just for grins, I went to the company's 'investors' tab on their website. At the bottom I found this:

"Communications are provided to inform our shareholders, customers and potential customers and others on a regular and timely basis of rapidly-occurring developments concerning our products and our business."

Yeah, uh huh. As good as that is (friggen hilarious actually), what followed was even better, and much, much more appropriate:

"Communications contain disclosures concerning developments relating to our business and our products and services, the actual results of which involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Although these communications contain information about what we and the reader may view as positive or significant developments concerning our products and services, such as test results and letters of intent, nothing in these communications are intended to infer or imply that development of commercially viable products or business relationships will occur or that we or our strategic partners will be able to generate revenues or profits from the sale of our products and services."

LMAO! What are these communications of which they speak!? Beats me, but obviously the CYA was thought a necessity.

The next part was even underlined. I can only imagine it was to really impress upon folks that there's a lot better than even chance that they were about to set fire to their hard earned, as opposed to those running and promoting the company imo, cash. Huh, in that case it'd be about as close as they've come, heretofore, to being altruistic.

"Shareholders and investors are strongly cautioned against placing undue reliance on information set forth in these communications in making any investment decisions concerning our securities."

I guess they recently figured things were actually starting to get a tad too hot and decided they'd best do something, anything. Thus the 'signs of life' PR, a month ago, about them and SITTM (Stick It To The Man). Unfortunately, the only folks who have had it 'stuck' to them, at least as far as I can tell, is us. The good folk who are sans the island retreat and, more than likely, off shore accounts. With our $ in them, I might add.

All of this, imho, continues to be a sad situation with no appreciable, let alone timely, end in sight. The question being, as it has been for quite some time now, how long do we wait before pulling the fire alarm?

Have a good one all. You too....'warburg':)


Lou