InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

oknpv

04/21/05 1:54 AM

#77804 RE: tampa123 #77802

Tampa...I admit in advance that I miss things, things that are important to me. Or much of the time, I dont read things right. I dont understand your statement "Today, their math is -Wave spends millions + makes lots of friends = borrows more millions". Do you mean that Wave has borrowed millions? (of dollars?). I thought that Wave was debt free. Please set me straight on this. Respectfully submitted.

icon url

go-kitesurf

04/21/05 8:44 AM

#77817 RE: tampa123 #77802

I agree tampa, which is why I oppose the authorization of more shares. If they truly are on the cusp, and as we can see there is a HUGE need for trusted computing, they need to be able to sell their knowledge. Heck, Wave would have made more money so far as a consultation firm to the TCG, instead of a company trying to sell technology. Anyway, I'm sick of the "where is the revenue" mantra. I am willing to see what comes out over the summer. If I'm not satisfied, I'm gone.
icon url

gowave1

04/21/05 9:47 AM

#77826 RE: tampa123 #77802

tampa,

I would argue that Wavoid math is even worse than you describe. Apparently, a "signed contract" is not worth the paper it's written on and is really not a contract at all. It changes from 10 million dollars to 10 million shares of a worthless company.