Replies to post #92375 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[99leadballoons]

Did you just quote a bunch of Expo PR's and web updates?

Everybody knows there is zero truth in those. How about a reliable link? How about something from WW?

We all know what happened. I think it is funny that JD got caught.

[fourkids_9pets]

exactly veno

with each post .. posted about
what DD wasn't done .. it becomes
very clear what is what

i can understand the frustration
of all exph sor .. after all a year's
delay wasn't anticipated or expected
by anyone .. but the facts exist and
for those of us who actually have $$$
in the *game* .. understandable ..
particularly if the actual DD was done

that is why i find it so *odd* and
truly ironic that those of us willing
to wait this out <with skin in the game>
advocate DD and no trades until T squared

after all if the issue is newbies sucked in
i'm on the record for wanting no volume until
mgmt is ACCOUNTABLE FOR TRANSPARENCY ..
which is also never *acknowledged*

since that's all been said b4 *many times over*
there truly isn't much to *discuss* until mgmt delivers

like you i understand the concept of accessing capital
for multiple reasons .. it's been over 6 weeks since the
last AS increase .. mgmt has provided a PR <update> in
regards to this and cash flow .. and folks can call the
TA daily and check NV SOS daily

==
4kids
all jmo

[Santa Barbara Broker]

Really?

Yes, really. Once again, with clarity. There was no formal written deal struck between WW or "Todd" or anybody by JD Brown. If there was, produce it or proof of it. Show the document signed between the companies. As I pointed out, there may have been an informal, "yeah, well maybe" exchanged which prompted Brown to seize on the opportunity to sell more of his PIPE funder's shares among other things, but there obviously was no contractual deal or it would have been honored by WW. Perhaps you can cite an example of a contract where a company, (the CEO of which is only a representative of the corporate entity which exists FOREVER), signs to allow distribution of product in their stores that has a clause that would relate to your ETC cabinet scenario between Expo and WW which clearly states in it "Unless the CEO dies...then the contract is cancelled"? Any example will be fine as I have never seen or heard of one....largely because, as I suspect you well know, 1) it's ludicrous and no one in their right mind would sign a contract with that clause in it and 2) it's highly likely no example exists because I doubt it could exist in a legal contractual agreement.

IMHO, there never was a formal written legal contract or it would have been honored, therefore there was no real enforceable "agreement" outside of a remote possibility of a distinct maybe...even that being totally unproven. Perhaps this agreement existed on an Expo website that was cached and is simply unavailable at this time and has had the potential to confuse Expo shareholders??? That has happened before. I look forward to seeing the "void only if the CEO passes away" clause as it pertains to the WW/Expo alleged "contract" at any rate. All IMHO.

SBB

[AStTropaz]

So the FACTS are exactly as SBB pointed out! There is NO EVIDENCE of a deal EVER with WW. Nowhere in EXPO's pumping material does it state that. No proof, no pudding, just shaky innuendo. Ohhhhhhh?!