Replies to post #92093 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[Renee]

Exactly , 99 ....and THAT defines transparency relevant to the public security ....NOT drive-bys ....NOT phone calls...NOT visits....NOT handshakes....NOT websites....and particularly NOT news releases .

Transparency is defined and universally accepted as ALL verifiable material relating to the stock , being vetted Financials , Filings ( to OTC ) about Share Structure , Filings on Form 3 of insider ownership and Form 4 / 5 for any changes to insider ownership .

EXPO HOLDINGS is not only NOT TRANSPARENT by universally accepted definitions , the company and MGMT have used deception and obfuscation as false substitutions for TRANSPARENCY .

All other pretenses championed as transparency by EXPO HOLDINGS are idiotic contradictions to established principles . EXPO HOLDINGS desperately depends on those viral , idiotic contradictions to enable them to deceive at will . EXPO HOLDINGS is insidiously transparent at deceptive practices .

[Renee]

Furthermore , EXPO Holdings' Insiders are either incredibly and insipidly stupid for allowing their purported ~ 800+ million shares to lose over $25 million in value from .03 cents to .0001/2 ( now worth $80,000 to $160,000 ) , or they sold for vast , illicit profits on verfiably FALSE and misleading news releases on the run-up to .03+ cents .

They should be embarrassed beyond words if they are incredibly and insipidly stupid for losing ~ $25 million in value for their purported 800+ million shares ( held collectively by various insiders ) by refusing to instil investor confidence on the universally understood and accepted principles of TRANSPARENCY , OR , they committed Securities Violations by selling vast amounts of shares on verifiably false and misleading news releases .

It's one or the other .