InvestorsHub Logo

windough-shopper

03/10/11 1:20 PM

#2318 RE: blackpeter1 #2317

EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

100% exactly

That means all of Eastern Europe, and Latin and South AMerica is open to em

especially since its already working in Serbia

others can see it works

they can use CHEAP AND CLEAN NAT GAS instead of DIRTY AND COSTLY DIESEL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

EXACTLY!

plus $2 billion in oil

windough-shopper

03/10/11 1:21 PM

#2319 RE: blackpeter1 #2317

Black

email me please

mms1516@aol.com

thx

back2basics

03/10/11 1:35 PM

#2320 RE: blackpeter1 #2317

I don't own any EGTK. I've been looking at it for a couple of weeks. No doubt they have a good story. I'm not here to beat up EGTK, but when I see, what looks to me like misinformation, I'm going to speak up.

I've read EGTK's PRs and am going back over them to see if they ever said that Israel would not build pipelines. I haven't found that yet. I'm still looking. Common sense and logic tell me there are parts of cities and towns where it wouldn't be practical to build NG distribution systems. LOTS of potential for EGTK in those situations

Where did you get the estimate of $50 BILLION to build pipelines in Israel? In 2007 Conoco/Phillips has estimated the cost of building an NG transmission line from the North Slope to the US border between Alberta & Montana at $ 32 BILLION. That includes an NG treating plant on the N. Slope and compressor stations every hundred mile or so on the pipeline.

Israel's area is ~ 8000 sq miles, roughly the size of New Jersey If you check a topo map the terrain the Conoco / Phillips transits is somewhat more challenging than that of Israel.

If I find that Israel does not plan to build pipelines, I be back here admitting my mistake.

I like EGTK. I don't think their lily need guilding.

B2B