InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BonelessCat

03/03/11 8:59 PM

#46944 RE: mdphd1 #46942

Mdphd1. How would you interpret this data?

"The most effective FluCide candidate demonstrated a fifteen-fold (15X) greater viral load reduction as compared to Tamiflu(r) (Roche), and a thirty-fold (30X) greater viral load reduction as compared to untreated animals.

Treatment with both FluCide candidates and Tamiflu commenced 24 hours after the initial viral infection. Tamiflu was administered orally twice daily at 20mg/kg (i.e. 40mg/kg/day) while the nanoviricides were intravenous injections at 100mg/kg every 48 hrs."

http://biomedme.com/general/nanoviricides-optimized-flucide-drug-candidates-reduce-viral-load-in-h1n1-influenza-virus-study_21179.html
icon url

noretreat

03/03/11 9:24 PM

#46948 RE: mdphd1 #46942

I think the measure is viral load...post test they look for and count viral particles per unit of volume/cell count or some equalizing measure.

flucide reduced viral load many times better than Tamiflu. I'd have to check the pr to get the number just right.

I eagerly await the next round of results for flucide, and expect them within 30 days.