InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

theguvna88

04/15/05 1:48 AM

#77008 RE: Snackman #77006

You are correct. Exactly why Wave does not need further liquidation until we see traction of all of these great developments just waiting to blossom given the right mgmt focus.
icon url

givelove

04/15/05 2:58 AM

#77011 RE: Snackman #77006

Snackman, I love your spirit and clear thinking. My feeling is you must have gas in the tank to win the race. The ability to raise cash for what ever reason is positive in my opinion. The best time to raise money is when you don't need it!
icon url

boombreaker

04/15/05 4:09 AM

#77013 RE: Snackman #77006

Snackman! - MILLION DOLLAR POST IMO - it's still a long road ahead, but helps prove that only if you truly believe in Wave's potential, then it will more than benefit those that do. Well Done. e/
icon url

orda

04/15/05 7:49 AM

#77022 RE: Snackman #77006

If it's that



close and that good, big revenues should be nearby. Then why more shares? You've already speculated that maybe Wave wants to buy a company. How about Microsoft taking a stake in Wave around or because of the info disclosed at WinHec?

icon url

solas

04/15/05 8:41 AM

#77038 RE: Snackman #77006

I want to hear this from Wave... not the internet. This may (and I believe) all be true and factual. But it needs to come from Wave.

-R
icon url

howardjoel

04/15/05 9:36 AM

#77050 RE: Snackman #77006

Snackman I agree with this post 99%. I hold the other 1 % as a personal safety net. I think that the biggest reason PPS has not begun to appreciate is something SKS has told us over and over again. He cannot talk about specific deals unless the other companies lift their NDA requirements or issue a PR themselves. I think if Steven had clear freedom to talk about who we are fully in bed with what those partners are trying to achieve, First to Market(favorite expression of his) in JMHO we would be trading at around $4 a share currently. Once again JMHO
icon url

Mbledug Dewe

04/15/05 10:22 AM

#77067 RE: Snackman #77006

Snackman, Dutton's credibility depends on the quality and objectivity of their coverage. They do not always pick a winner and they do issue negative opinions.